Amelia E. Talley

Texas Tech University

Mackenzie A. Cook

Catherine A. Schroy

Texas Ladies’ University

Abstract

Making use of ladies’ self-identified intimate identification, the present research compares motivations for very very very first same-sex intimate encounters also linked experiential results. We additionally examine whether relations between intimate motivations and outcomes that are experiential as a function of females’s intimate identification status. Individuals had been ladies (N=123), many years 18-to-29 (M=21.59, SD=3.33), who self-reported a brief history of same-sex intimate contact. Roughly 27% of females recognized as solely heterosexual (in other terms., EH), 35% as mainly heterosexual (for example., ‘mostly heterosexual’ MH), and 38% as solely or primarily lesbian/ gay, or bisexual (i.e., LGB). Individuals finished a survey that is online. MH and LGB females reported very very first same-sex intimate encounters which were more inspired by closeness and research motives, in accordance with EH womenpared to MH and LGB females, EH additionally involved with less intimate tasks due to their very very first partner that is same-sex. Intimacy and exploration motives had been pertaining to good experiential results during very first contact that is same-sex. Associations between motivations and outcomes that are experiential maybe maybe not moderated by intimate identification. Findings play a role in understanding motivations and experiences associated with ladies’ very first same-sex intimate encounters and show that not totally all ladies with a brief history of same-sex intimate contact later recognize having a minority intimate identification label.

Humans take part in sexual intercourse for many different reasons and, necessary for the approach that is motivational understanding intimate behavior, these motivating factors are thought to contour subsequent experiences and expressions of sex (Cooper, Barber, Zhaoyang, & Talley, 2011). The precise reasons encouraging sexual intercourse, including same-sex activity, can mirror ones own broader approach or avoidance orientations ( e.g., Birnbaum et al., 2014), that https://camsloveaholics.com/female/bbw are theorized become associated with distinct neurological and behavioral systems (Birnbaum et al., 2014; Gray, 1970, 1987). As an example, present findings claim that underlying excitatory/inhibitory motivational systems affect the incentive value related to various risk-taking behavior (Birnbaum et al., 2014; Nagoski et al., 2012) and intimate stimuli (Birnbaum et al. 2014; Ferrey et al., 2012) and could have broad affect psychosocial and intimate functioning (Birnbaum et al. 2014; Impett et al., 2008).

The importance of understanding motivational facets for starting same-sex activity that is sexual self-evident. This knowledge has got the prospective to tell basic research examining facets that motivate adolescents’ and adults’ research of varied intimate tourist attractions and impulses and fundamentally notify their self-identification with a specific intimate identification (for example., intimate identification development; Rosario, Schrimshaw, & Hunter, 2006). The work that is current has relevance for used researchers who look for to produce interventions that restrict negative effects ( ag e.g., intimately transmitted infections) for folks with distinct underlying motivations for intercourse which might potentiate risk-taking during initial and subsequent intimate encounters ( e.g., intercourse intoxicated by medications or liquor).

Although initial intimate encounters might have lasting effect on subsequent sex and development ( e.g., Epstein, Bailey, Manhart, Hill, & Hawkins, 2014), a systematic contrast of teenagers’ subjective connection with and motivations with their initial intimate encounters predicated on their self-identified intimate identification, aside from their partner’s biological intercourse, has yet become carried out. A person’s intimate identification is informed by different areas of their sex, including their self-labeling ( e.g., heterosexual, bisexual) in addition to their attraction toward and engagement in sexual intercourse with lovers of varying sex identities (Laumann, Gagnon, Michael, & Michaels, 1994; Morgan, 2013). Findings from qualitative interviews with “self-identified intimate minorities” (Galupo, Davis, Grynkiewiez, & Mitchell, 2014) claim that self-labeling of your intimate identification is of main value in considering and determining a person’s intimate orientation. Individuals’ present, self-ascribed intimate identification had been regarded as “primary over present and previous experience that may otherwise be interpreted as ‘contradictory’” (p. 16).