With guys
Of these whom reported penetrative intercourse with guys (penis-vagina) (n=170), 32% had never ever utilized condoms or femidoms, 45% utilized them periodically or frequently, and 23% constantly did. Of these whom reported anal penetration with a penis (n=35), 42% had never ever utilized a condom or femidom, 29% utilized them periodically or frequently, and 29% constantly did. Regarding the 128 ladies who reported dental intercourse with males, 80% never ever utilized condoms, 16% periodically or frequently, and 4% constantly utilized them.
CONVERSATION
Review of methodology
Test response and selection prices
13 These definitions are definitely not congruent, and therefore are very likely to vary in level and as time passes. We selected topics on such basis as both intimate identification and behaviour that is sexual. We used convenience sampling (chosen by virtue of attendance at lesbian clinics or through lesbian and bisexual women’s community teams) since lesbian and bisexual orientation that is sexual stigmatised and subjects difficult to take research. 14 The clinics had been advertised as lesbian health that is sexual, while the study referred to as a study of lesbian intimate wellness, therefore bisexual women can be apt to be under-represented. The results presented may not be directly generalisable to lesbians and bisexual women in other settings while the community sample was purposively selected to reflect demographic diversity. These information are not designed to express all lesbians and bisexual ladies, but alternatively to spell it out variety of intimate history and training in a big test of females that have intercourse with ladies.
Survey techniques
Studies of intimate wellness are inevitably susceptible to inaccuracies such as for instance recall bias and desirability bias that is social. 15, 16 additionally, questions regarding intimate behavior are prone to be interpreted in subtly different means by participants dependant on what’s considered “sex” or perhaps a “partner” by participants. For instance, while 85% reported past intercourse with guys, 82% reported having had more than one male partner that is sexual.
The study utilized a framework with primarily questions that are closed predetermined response groups. The diversity that is true of history and training is consequently apt to be under-represented by these outcomes. We now have noted differing reaction prices to various specific concerns; the poorest reaction prices had been for questions regarding anal intercourse and also this may introduce reaction bias.
Discussion of outcomes
This study comprises the largest information set of lesbian and bisexual women’s intimate behavior in britain. Direct evaluations of our outcomes along with other studies are hard due to variations in sampling practices, definitions of intimate orientation, formula of concerns, or descriptive statisticsparisons may be made out of six studies of intimate behavior that have been completed through the 1990s. Two are Uk: (a) the Pride Survey, 17 a convenience test of 278 lesbians at London’s annual Pride event, and (b) the nationwide Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles 1990–1 (NATSAL), 18 a likelihood test of 18 876 of which 178 females reported sex genital contact that is same. Three studies are US: (c) a nationwide survey that is postal when you look at the mag The Advocate, which recruited 6935 lesbians, 19 (d) the Boston Lesbian wellness venture, a nationwide study of 1633 lesbians recruited by snowballed sampling, 20 and ( ag ag ag ag e) the nationwide health insurance and Social Life Survey (NHSLS), 2 a likelihood test of 3432, of which 140 females reported exact same intercourse lovers. The past is Australian: (f) a study of 1408 ladies who have sexual 
